![]() |
http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~koehl/ |
|
Protein Sequence Design2. A Monte Carlo Approach to The inverse Protein Folding Problem 2.1 Inverse protein folding problem ?The inverse folding problem was originally defined by Drexler [1] and Pabo [2] as the problem of defining the sequences compatible with a given protein fold. It is fundamental to protein design and engineering, and, as such, as attracted considerable interest [3-8]. Since the function of a protein is directly related to its three dimensional structure, manipulation of the structure via the sequence changes can provide functional diversity. Protein molecules can be engineered to optimize their activities, as well as to alter their pharmacokinetic properties. This page describes the method we developed for solving this problem. 2.2 BackgroundThe aim of protein sequence design is to generate sequences compatible with the target structure, but incompatible with competing folds. As such, there is one theoretical issue, and one computational problem to be solved. Here we provide links to general reviews that cover both subjects: 2.3 Our Strategy for Protein Sequence DesignOur protein sequence design uses a Monte Carlo search technique in sequence space, a SCMF technique in structure space, and the Random Energy Model for reaching specificity. [9]
References1. Drexler, KE. Molecular engineering: an approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 78, 5275-5278 (1981). 2. Pabo, C. Designing proteins and peptides. Nature, 301, 200 (1983). 3. Mutter, M and Tuchscherer, G. Nonnative Architectures In Protein Design and Mimicry. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 53, 851-863 (1997).4. Smith, CK and Regan, L. Construction and Design Of Beta-Sheets. Accounts Of Chemical Research, 30, 153-161 (1997). 5. Cao, AN, Lai, LH and Tang, YQ. The Current State and Prospect Of De-Novo Protein Design. Progress In Biochemistry and Biophysics, 25, 197-201 (1998). 6. Giver, L and Arnold, FH. Combinatorial Protein Design By In-Vitro Recombination. Current Opinion In Chemical Biology, 2, 335-338 (1998). 7. Regan, L and Wells, J. Engineering and Design. Recent adventures in molecular design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8, 441-442 (1998). 8. Shakhnovich, EI. Protein Design : a Perspective From Simple Tractable Models. Folding & Design, 3, R45-R58 (1998). 9. Koehl, P and Levitt, M. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity. Journal of Molecular Biology, 293, 1161-1181 (1999).
|